A Detailed Look at SF Coyote Diets and Some of the Causes for Individual and Family Differences

For full article, press here: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70152

Abstract

In the past decade, studies have demonstrated that urban and nonurban wildlife populations exhibit differences in foraging behavior and diet. However, little is known about how environmental heterogeneity shapes dietary variation of organisms within cities. We examined the vertebrate prey components of diets of coyotes (Canis latrans) in San Francisco to quantify territory- and individual-level dietary differences and determine how within-city variation in land cover and land use affects coyote diet. We genotyped fecal samples for individual coyote identification and used DNA metabarcoding to quantify diet composition and individual niche differentiation. The highest contributor to coyote diet overall was anthropogenic food followed by small mammals. The most frequently detected species were domestic chicken, pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), domestic pig, and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Diet composition varied significantly across territories and among individuals, with territories explaining most of the variation. Within territories (i.e., family groups), the amount of dietary variation attributed to among-individual differences increased with green space and decreased with impervious surface cover. The quantity of anthropogenic food in scats also was positively correlated with impervious surface cover, suggesting that coyotes consumed more human food in more urbanized territories. The quantity of invasive, human-commensal rodents in the diet was positively correlated with the number of food services in a territory. Overall, our results revealed substantial intraspecific variation in coyote diet associated with urban landscape heterogeneity and point to a diversifying effect of urbanization on population diet.

INTRODUCTION

Urban landscapes are complex mosaics of biophysical properties that have been designed to support diverse human activities and requirements (Des Roches et al., 2020). Within cities, transitions in percent cover of impervious surfaces, building density, economic activity, and . . .

For full article, press here: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70152

Tali Caspi’s Diet Study in SFGate!

To read more in SF Gate, with more of my photos, go to: https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/urban-coyote-diets-san-francisco-18703009.php

Tali wrote her own introduction to her study for this blog almost two months ago: https://coyoteyipps.com/2024/01/20/using-dna-in-scat-to-study-coyote-diet-by-tali-caspi/

More photos of coyote eating habits in San Francisco: https://coyoteyipps.com/urbancoyotesquared-gallery-of-urban-coyote-life/coyote-eating-habits-in-san-francisco-gallery/

Using DNA in Scat to Study Coyote Diet, by Tali Caspi

Traditionally, ecologists study diet either by directly observing what animals are eating, or by dissecting animal scat and looking for prey remains. However, these methods have some challenges and limitations. For one, it takes a lot of time and effort to observe wild animals, and though we may be able to observe them foraging, it can be hard to see everything they eat and estimate the relative amounts of different foods consumed by different individuals. Regarding dissection, this method relies on there being undigested parts in the scat left behind – for example fur or bones which are used to identify the species consumed. However, in cities, animals have access to a lot of foods that may not leave anything visual behind in the scat for us to identify. For example, a chicken nugget won’t leave any chicken bones or feathers behind! However, it will leave some chicken DNA behind. This is where a more recent technology for studying diet, known as DNA metabarcoding, is very useful. This method allows scientists to quantify and characterize the diet of animals by first amplifying the DNA present in the scat and then identifying which species that DNA belongs to.

As part of my dissertation research for my PhD in ecology at UC Davis, I am using DNA metabarcoding to identify the species that coyotes in San Francisco consume, estimate which food items are the most frequently eaten, and consider how the diets of coyotes differ depending on where in the city they live. I’m still completing my data analysis, but I have some tidbits to share!

First, coyotes in San Francisco eat a lot of food provided by people, such as domestic chicken and pig – this could be coming from pet foods, garbage, or meat people intentionally put out for coyotes. As Janet has described in her blog many times, this isn’t good. Not only can these foods lack the nutritional content that coyotes need to thrive, but the presence of these foods brings coyotes into closer contact with people, which can lead to interactions between people and coyotes that are undesirable. Securing garbage, not leaving out attractants like fallen fruit and pet food, and making sure to never feed wildlife help decrease the quantity of these foods in coyote diets.

Second, coyotes in San Francisco eat a lot of pocket gophers—they are experts at hunting gophers, which are present throughout most of the city. Other frequently consumed natural prey includes raccoons, voles, and rats.

Finally, although coyotes in San Francisco do eat domestic cats, it’s not as common as many people think: I’m only detecting cats in <5% of the scats I’ve collected. Still, from the standpoint of cat welfare, it’s always a good idea to keep pet cats indoors. Not only does this keep your cats safer, but it protects wildlife and is better for human health and the environment. More to come!

Scat is Where It’s At, by Walkaboutlou

Scat showing berry seeds, rodents and grasshoppers. ©Walkaboutlou

This coyote isn’t raiding sheep, lamb, or calves. 

It’s been at the berries, rodents and grasshoppers. And so has its family. 

[I responded asking if this could be sent to the ranchers who were complaining]

This has been done and they followed up with trail cams in different spots. (Not a light decision..the bears often damage the cameras. Expensive.) 

They did find a coyote with prey…a feral cat. (That’s another plus…for the local songbirds and quail) No coyote seen outside sheep pastures…but two neighbor dogs were. (From over mile away and both times between 10 pm-1am. )

So scat scouting really is needed to confirm coyote predation or to pin point what really is going on. 

In this case, dogs freed at night were the prime suspects, not the local coyote pair. 

Lou