A Coyote Is Intruded Upon, yet again, by a Dog

The only time I have ever heard a coyote yipping has been after it was intruded upon. I heard a coyote yipping, the same coyote, both yesterday and again today. The yipping is a distressed, high-pitched barking. It may go on for 20 minutes or more. It appears to be the coyote’s way of complaining. In the parks where I have heard it, it always has been caused by a dog. A dog had either chased the coyote, or came in too close to it. A human intrusion, such as throwing stones to ward it off, could possibly cause the same barking reaction from a coyote, however, a coyote is more likely to flee this scenario. By yipping, the coyote is both voicing its discontent and standing its ground, albeit at a distance, as far as I have seen. Please keep your dogs leashed when a coyote is around.

And now I’m seeing coyotes react to individual specific dogs walking about 100 feet away. These are usually dogs which have  chased or intruded on the coyote in the past. But also, now, I’m seeing that a coyote will feel intruded upon if specific dogs “eye” the coyote on its perch — possibly in an antagonistic way — something like giving the coyote “the evil eye”. In addition to the complaining and standing up for itself which I’ve seen when a dog actually chases it, the coyote’s barking may also be voicing its territorial claim.

I know a number of people who think, “Well, it’s a coyote and that’s what they do: they yip.” However, there is always a reason for the yipping; it never occurs without cause.

A Coyote Reacts To Dogs As Individuals: Examples

I have listed here eight instances of a coyote’s reaction to dogs and humans to show what one might expect. Except for the human encounter, and the tightly leashed dog encounter, this coyote did not quickly flee. The coyote was responding, in all the other examples, to either past incidents with a particular dog, or to the immediate situation in which it felt potentially threatened or intruded upon. Please note that encountering a coyote will almost always involve the coyote fleeing or hiding. The coyote described here is bolder than most and the leader of its pack: it is important to be aware of this type of coyote.

1) We watched a coyote keep away from, and monitor, a group of dogs and walkers that this coyote long ago had become wary of:  the dogs in this group have chased the coyote, and these people now throw stones at it. There definitely is a feeling of antagonism between certain coyotes and certain dog walking groups. The result is that the coyote keeps away from them, and instead watches them, and sometimes insures for itself that they leave the park by occasionally following them at a distance.

This morning, when the coyote first saw, or maybe heard, this group approaching, it hurried up to a high vantage point above the trail to watch them. Neither the dogs nor walkers seemed to be aware of the coyote. The coyote kept intently focused on them, scrutinizing every move of the group as it slowly walked by. Usually after this group passes, this coyote remains on its ledge to relax for a little while. It began to do so. However, within only a few minutes, another walker and her dog passed by below on the same path.

2) This time, after watching these go by, the coyote scurried down from its rock and followed the dog and walker at about a 60 foot distance — it followed at a casual and slow pace. I was able to observe them only until they went over the horizon — beyond the crest of the hill they were hidden from my view. They did not seem to know that the coyote was there — neither the dog nor the walker stopped or looked back while they were within my view. This dog is another one that has pursued this coyote, and it tugs on the leash attempting to go after the coyote whenever the coyote is in its sight. So, for the coyote, these were not benign passers by. I have observed that the coyote has a keen memory of past incidents and of individual dogs who frequent the park. All previous coyote interactions with particular dogs have to be taken into account when assessing what is going on with a coyote. The coyote probably wanted to make sure that this dog was headed out of the park. I’ve seen this coyote follow the above mentioned larger dog group with this purpose, and I have seen it follow this walker for a short distance.

BEHAVIOR I’M SEEING:

Our coyotes have always become agitated around dogs who get too close to them: the agitation is manifested through scratching the ground in anger and grunting. These are blatant warnings given by a coyote to warn off any dog. The coyote may also engage in a distressed barking session for 20 or so minutes. This barking has always been the result of a dog intruding on a coyote. Ultimately the coyote may nip at the dog to move it away and warn it off.

In an urban park, dogs and coyotes are pitted together in a relatively small area. Might there be a SPACE issue here? Coyotes need to be able to roam over areas for food without feeling constant competition or threats from dogs. Dogs are all over the park — it is the unleashed and unruly ones that have been a problem, usually in the remoter parts of the park. An unruly dog may pursue, get too close, or threaten coyotes in other ways, such as through visual cues. Coyotes can read subtle cues involving eye-contact, level of energy and body language: this is how all canines communicate. Unfortunately, even leashed dogs communicate this way. What is often communicated is threats and antagonism.

Lately, I have seen a coyote take more initiatives regarding dogs — possibly it is trying to take control of a situation — especially when it involved dogs which have threatened it in any of the ways I’ve listed above. For instance, I’ve seen a coyote approach an area where there were several dogs: here it normally waits at the periphery and observes, but I have seen it also put on its agitated warning display — the same as when it has been intruded upon. The coyote’s approach to this area was seemingly because the coyote didn’t like the noise or activity level of the dogs, but also there were dogs there which had approached the coyote in the past. Other initiatives a coyote has taken are keeping an eye on — monitoring — those dogs which have chased it or intruded upon it, and following particular dogs to make sure they leave the park. Please remember that even if our dogs approach a coyote with playful intentions, this is NOT how a coyote sees the approach: allowing your dog to approach a coyote in the first place sets up a situation where now the coyote knows the particular dog and will keep vigilant when it is around.

On the other hand, I have seen coyotes respect those dogs which have accorded them respect. Coyotes know immediately upon seeing a dog if it is respectful. This kind of respect has to trickle down from the owner. There are dogs who are dismissive of their owners as their pack leader and for this reason they don’t obey their owners.  This includes dogs who pull at their leashes.  These dogs which are disrespectful towards their owners appear to be the same ones who also are disrespectful of coyotes.

———-

So, back to the lone walker with her dog which I left off above. Within minutes I heard the familiar distressed barking of this coyote — it was upset and complaining. I have never heard a coyote bark without provocation when there are walkers and dogs in the park. My guess is that this walker became aware of the coyote and threw a stone at it because it was following her — I’ve seen her do this before when a coyote followed her, or it could be that her dog lunged towards the coyote. The coyote must have fled immediately up to the top of the hill to where I was hearing it — it was no longer anywhere close to the path or to the walker. The barking subsided fairly quickly.

In this case, one could say that the coyote actually caused the incident by following the dog. But it should be remembered that the coyote was most likely reacting to the previous behavior of this particular dog. Could it also have been reacting to more generalized stresses caused by a constant stream of dogs in the park, many of which are unruly and any of which could be a potential threat?

3) Shortly thereafter, I saw this same coyote on a rock further along the same path that all of the above mentioned walkers and their dogs always take. This coyote seems to know the habitual routes of most of the regular walkers in this park and chooses lookout points from which it can confirm that certain of them have left the area. There are actually only a couple of groups monitored in this way. When I saw the coyote on its rock, the dogs had already gone by.  The coyote was peacefully observing its world when two British fellows and their dogs came by — dogs that have not had an incident with the coyote because they have been kept away from coyotes and leashed. The coyote, high above the path on its rock, stood up at alert to assess what was happening with them, and then it casually took off. This last is by far the most common response to dogs and people by this coyote.

In the next few days I watched several people deal very differently with this same coyote. I wanted to list these for everyone’s enlightenment.

4) A woman with her Ridgeback was coming up the same path that a coyote was taking in the opposite direction. Each saw the other approaching. The woman decided to move forward with her dog tightly leashed right next to her side. When she got within about 60 feet of the coyote, the coyote decided to turn back and eventually it moved into the area beside the path. Both parties then went on their merry way. There had never been a previous antagonistic encounter between these two. This woman did it exactly right: by keeping her dog tightly leashed and right next to herself, the dog was not free to follow its own desires or instincts, nor did it have much chance of communicating visually with the coyote. The woman controlled the situation.

5) Afterwards,  a woman with no dog came walking towards this same coyote which had moved further on, but was still on this path. They got to within 30 feet from each other — the configuration of the winding path did not allow much distant visibility. The coyote, again, veered off the path. The woman kept walking and never saw the coyote.This type of encounter I have seen a number of times.

6) Another encounter involved a man with an unleashed dog, a regular walker in the park. Last year he used to allowed his dog to “play” with this coyote: “Ahh, they know each other”, he told me when I asked him to please leash-up. So this coyote and dog had interacted in the past, but the interaction was probably less about “playing”, in the eyes of the coyote, and more about the “chase-chase” and “oneupmanship” behavior I have spoken about before. We all know that “interaction” of any sort with a coyote breeds familiarity and breaks down the “wild” barrier that we all have been counting on for our coyotes.

So this man was walking his unleashed dog when the coyote appeared from behind a bush. It was early in the morning. The dog went after the coyote. With intense yelling the owner was able to retrieve his dog and then take off with his now leashed dog. The coyote did not follow them, but stayed in the same location. I wondered if the coyote could have been purposefully waiting for this man to re-appear? This coyote keeps its eyes on certain dogs in the park which it has become wary of due to their antagonistic encounters with it. And the coyote knows the habitual routes of those who frequent the park — the walks in the area tend to be loops — it might have known the man and his dog would re-appear. When I saw this man re-approaching again, the coyote began scratching the ground and grunting — a clear sign of its agitation at seeing the dog and walker again. This time the dog was leashed firmly at its owner’s side. The coyote ran off up to a little knoll to get away from them as the man passed by.  The coyote remained here and watched, but it did not “flee”, nor did it follow. What did it mean that this coyote remained without leaving? There were no other walkers at this time.

7) On this same day, I joined two friends for part of their walk. They each had large Labradors, one of which occasionally had pursued the coyote. We walked around and then came upon this same coyote who had remained, unusually, in pretty much the same spot where I had last seen it. I decided to stay to see what might happen with this coyote, so my friends walked on up a hill, intermittently stopping to look at the coyote. The coyote stood in a wide open area, with its ears lying flat back for much of the time — it was agitated and grunted a little when the two Labs stopped on the path with their eyes on it. The dogs and walkers eventually walked on, and the the coyote’s behavior subsided. The coyote did not follow them. Although these Labs had not approached the coyote, they had been fairly close  — I would say right at the border of the coyote’s “critical distance,” and they had been looking at the coyote intently. Intensity of gaze is seen as a threat by many animals. After these dogs left, the coyote meandered to a more secluded spot through a grassy area looking for gophers before climbing a hill where it could rest in peace.  That was the end of the activities while I was there.

8- Today I saw this coyote react agitatedly towards a dog which has seldom upset it. This dog and its owner came down their habitual everyday path. The coyote has watched them often enough to know that this dog keeps away from it: the dog has never chased the coyote. Today the coyote was hunting in an open area when it became aware of the walker; it stopped its activity and watched. However, the coyote did not like it when the dog veered off the path in the coyote’s direction — the dog must have come too close to the coyote; also the dog may have been facing the coyote.  Rather than move away, the coyote began a defensive display, and then ducked into some tall grass where it went into a distressful barking session. The dog and walker just kept walking on, but the barking didn’t subside for many moments.

I’m wondering if the sheer number of dogs and their movement in the park could be an underlying stressor to the coyote’s agitation and reaction to dogs?

Coyotes Respond to Previous Dog Behaviors; Coyote/Dog Interactions Are Drawing Coyotes Towards Humans

Coyotes have approached certain dogs in our parks — and not always just out of friendly curiosity. I have only seen this happen IF the dog first came to within about 100 feet of where the coyote was, and only to particular dogs. Could the wariness which coyotes have always had be waning? No one I have spoken to has ever seen a coyote approach a person in our parks, not ever  — it is always the dogs which they approach. However, this has occurred even though a human was near by. Humans who are with their dogs can ultimately scare the coyote off because coyotes do maintain their fear of humans. But why are they sometimes approaching dogs?

There are a number of unleashed dogs which have had antagonistic encounters with a coyote. From what I have seen, these are the ones the coyote reacts to later on if the dog comes within its “critical distance” — about 100 feet, rather than just flee. In fact, these particular dogs — those that have had antagonistic encounters with a coyote — seem to actually “attract” the coyote: it is these the coyote monitors, it is these the coyote has followed. The coyote seems to need to keep tabs on these dogs, and to even “show them who is boss” . . . IF the coyote has a chance. The coyote’s behavior is a defensive “standing up for itself.”  In this case, the coyote has taken the initiative to give warning to a dog to stay away.

My own little cattle dog, Cinder, is the very best example I have of this behavior: Two young and large unleashed Dalmatians went after her a number of times as she and I walked on a sidewalk. The owner apologized, but this did not solve the problem for my dog. She was a shy little dog who was actually afraid — she always stayed right next to me. Then at a much later date we passed these two dogs again. My husband and our larger dog were with us this time. We could not believe what we saw: my shy little cattle dog actually charged at these two dogs as they headed away from us — she barked ferociously at them — her body language was very clear: “take that, leave, and leave me alone.” She came loping back to us triumphantly. The shy little dog had the will to let the dogs know what she thought; she was sick of their treatment of her. She was standing up for herself. Our reaction was “Yay Cinder!”

Coyotes can distinguish each and every dog that frequents a park. And they certainly remember the behaviors that have been dished out to them by certain individual dogs. Some of these dogs, always those which are unleashed and unruly, have distressed the coyotes by chasing them and by approaching too close to them. The coyotes have always reacted in the past by fleeing, or by backing off to a safe distance before barking or exhibiting bluffing displays to ward off the dog. These self-protective warning displays are very clear messages.

Coyotes more recently have actually approached a few of these dogs in the same manner that Cinder approached the two Dalmatians. The coyotes don’t run across the park to accost a dog; what happens is that a dog will unknowingly come into the coyote’s wider “critical space”, or the dog and coyote will inadvertently find themselves heading in the same direction. This then is when the coyote might make a move — as far as I can tell, always coming up from behind, the same as my dog did. The coyote’s behavior involves the same “chase-chase” and “oneupmanship” which I have described before. Others have read it as taunting. In all cases it is a warning and a message. The “display” is clearly a repellant one.  To understand the logic of this dynamic one has only to know how certain dogs have treated the coyote, no matter how long ago.  A subtler interaction that few humans are attuned to is the eye-contact, body language and energy level which so easily communicate threat to a coyote. A dog pulling at its leash towards a coyote is in this category. The coyotes read the meaning of these behaviors easily, and may react to them. These are interactions we need to prevent. Keeping our dogs leashed and as far away from any coyotes as possible is the only method that works for keeping them from interacting on any level. Please keep your dogs leashed in our urban parks, both for your dog’s protection and the coyote’s.

In an urban park it is expected that there will be a certain amount of “habituation” taking place between a coyote and humans and dogs: each is going to get used to the other, no matter what, due simply to being in the same physical setting. However, it is actual “interaction” that needs to be prevented in order to keep our coyotes wild. Interaction seems to breed familiarity, and familiarity breeds contempt, it appears. Dog owners have allowed interaction and interference between their dogs and coyotes: chasing, communication which is antagonistic and getting too close to the coyotes. It is “interaction” of this sort between coyotes and dogs which is actually slowly breaking down the “wild” barrier that was in place when these coyotes arrived in our parks. It is this dog/coyote interaction which is actually drawing coyotes towards humans — it is happening through our dogs. The only interactions I have ever seen between humans and coyotes has involved humans shooing them away from their dogs: here you have a coyote and a human in close proximity — interaction and proximity is breaking down the “wild” barrier that we all want so badly to preserve. Dog owners can keep this sort of interaction from occurring. Humans observing or photographing coyotes in the park do not interact with coyotes or attract them. These same humans have not caused dogs to approach or pursue the coyotes, and neither do these same humans cause coyotes to approach the dogs. I’m mentioning this here, because it has been absurdly suggested by dog owners who refuse to leash their dogs. It is the dog owner’s responsibility to keep their dogs in check.

Marking: Coyote behavior

Right after going to a rock and looking over to see what was going on below — there was a dog being walked — this coyote happened upon something that caught its attention. I don’t know if it was the sight of it or the smell of it which attracted the coyote. It stopped and sniffed the area on the ground intently. Then it walked forward a few paces and urinated on it. And then it walked on, first shaking itself out and then scratching itself. I, of course, stopped to see if I could tell what this was about. What had been urinated on was coyote scat from several days ago. Hmmm. See first 6 photos.

Deliberate urinating on something is how animals leave a message. Several months ago I had seen a coyote pick up a dead mole and then spit it out disgustedly. The coyote then walked forward a few paces and urinated on it. I had assumed that it was a message to her young pups to avoid it — after all, the rodent was dead and might have been poisonous.

But why would a coyote mark coyote scat when the only coyotes around are three that belong to the same immediate family? The only plausible reason that I could think of would have been to “trump” a dog’s having marked it. Most marking has to do with territory boundaries and ownership. This was probably an instance of oneupmanship!

Update 5/19/10: See last 3 photos. Five days later, this exact same spot was again marked, this time by an offspring of the first coyote. Again, the coyote was walking by when it whiffed something that made it stop. Then it went up to “the spot”, sniffed the area carefully, and then urinated on it. Note that this time the marking coyote is a male!

More Lone Activity

I recently wrote about the interactions of a pack, which is a coyote family, as I found them traversing a park, headed to their “home” area in the morning. It is rare to see a family together, though two of them can be seen at times. It is more common to encounter a single lone coyote.

The reason for this is that coyotes hunt individually. This is because their food source in this area consists mostly of voles and gophers: small rodents which, as food, cannot be divided up among various hunters — these are crunched and then swallowed whole. In our area it might take more than one coyote to take down a raccoon, but raccoons are not the normal prey for coyotes — they are quite large and fierce fighters. We have seen skunk carcasses, and it is possible that more than one coyote shares in this.

Pack activity does occur in other areas when smaller rodents aren’t so prevalent, and when there happen to be larger prey around. Likely candidates are young deer or unprotected young farm animals such as lambs.

A Resting Coyote Responds Differently to Humans and Dogs

A coyote might feel very comfortable watching activity in a park from a high ledge which is 100-200 feet away from a path. I had occasion to watch a coyote who did this two days in a row, and I was able to see two distinct reactions to passers by, based on if there was a dog involved.

First, a lone runner came by. The runner could not have seen the coyote because of the configuration of the path. The coyote heard the runner, got up and looked, and then disappeared in a flash. The runner jogged on by without ever seeing the coyote. That was the end of that. Coyotes do not want humans to get close to them and will make an effort to keep their distance and also hide. Another reaction I have seen to a human coming down a path is for the coyote to run off a distance and remain absolutely still and thus difficult to see.

On the second day I saw this same coyote relaxing on the same ledge. Before I knew what was going on, I saw the coyote bolt up and disappear in a flash. Not until then did I see that a man and his dog were walking in the coyote’s direction. Neither had seen the coyote at this initial meeting and therefore they not react. Because of the dog, there was more going on this time. I could not see where the coyote had gone, however, within a few minutes I heard the coyote barking in its distressed manner about 500 feet further on.  I headed in that direction. I have only heard coyotes bark when they have been intruded upon. Yes, the coyote had been intruded upon, but the barking had not begun until the dog probably faced the coyote, even if there was a substantial distance between them.

Although I never did spot the coyote visually after it had moved, I did see the same man and his dog right at the spot where I had heard the coyote — he was walking away from the direction the coyote’s barking came from. I don’t think that the coyote had “delayed” its barking. The coyote must have actually followed them, unnoticed, to check them out and see where they were headed. It is when the coyote finally was noticed that the coyote’s barking reaction occurred. I don’t know if there had been a chase involved in this case or if the dog just turned towards the coyote. Anyway, the coyote ended up barking its discontent loudly, but not for as long as I have heard in the past. This was for only 4 minutes rather than 20.

Coyotes have a much keener interest in dogs and a total disinterest humans, even though there is a need to keep their distance from both. The coyote needs to find out more about the dogs, and may approach them not only to find out if there is a possibility of them becoming a potential threat, but to let them know through intimidating displays to keep away.

Coyote Agitated At Being Intruded Upon

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I was in the right spot to watch a coyote which was been intruded upon by a dog. The coyote had been hunting close to a path when it stopped to observe the walker and his dog approaching. This was in an area of the park where few others had yet arrived. The walker and dog have passed this coyote many times in the past: the dog and coyote normally observe each other but always appear to respect each other’s space, and move on without incident. The dog has never chased the coyote.

Today, when the dog got within about 30 feet, the coyote became agitated: it scratched the ground, hackles up, bared its teeth and after a minute of this it ran off into the tall grass where it began its distressed barking. I have only seen a coyote bark after it has felt intruded upon. Although the owner has always remained on the path, the dog sometimes wanders off a short distance, and it may be that having done so in the coyote’s direction is what caused the coyote to react this way. Maybe there was more going on, such as intense eye contact. Intense eye-contact constitutes a challenge. I was not able to see this, so will never know if this was part of the equation.

This is a display. It is meant to look scary, otherwise it would not be effective. It is meant to ward off the dog. Cats engage in very similar displays when they feel threatened — just think of the classical Halloween cat: arched back, fur on end, up on its hind legs, teeth showing. The message is “get away from me.”

Ears

Note the different ear positions of a coyote which tell us so much! Coyote ears are big and their hearing is very sensitive. Their hearing is so acute that they have been known to recognize a hunter 3 miles away — their large outer ears are able to capture sounds that we humans are not attuned to. However, I have watched a coyote jolt up in surprise at a walker or dogs that suddenly appeared from around a bend close to where the coyote was resting! Maybe they tune out sometimes!

Besides hearing, the coyote’s ear positions actually tell us a lot about a coyote’s attention and emotional state — and in fact these are easily read by other coyotes — they communicate their emotions and intentions this way to one another.

When the ears are both pointed UP and pointed forwards, the coyote is concentrating intently on something in the direction ahead, and probably looking intently at the same thing.

When the ears are laid back, all the way against the neck, there appears to be timidity or fear or even submission involved. I’ve seen this when a coyote pup approached its mother, and I’ve seen it when a coyote stood very still in one spot keeping its eyes on two large dogs which were above the coyote’s level.

When the ears are level and out to the side it appears that coyotes are in a content or neutral state. I have seen ears out like this when nothing is going on: after a coyote has been up on a ledge scoping an area where, it turns out, there is no one. I have seen ears out to the side like this after one coyote had a leg injury. Could ears out to the side also indicate pain or resignation?

Constantly moving ears which “swivel” from position to position are picking up ALL the various surrounding sounds. As a coyote swivels its ears it will also turn its head so that sounds in back are picked up better. Coyotes need to know  if danger is lurking nearby.

Bad Nose Injury

It was not until I got home and zoomed-in on these photos that I realized I had encountered an injured coyote. The black tip of the nose was lacerated around the edges and bent down, and it was somewhat extended as if it had been bitten into and pulled. There is something about Kipling’s “The Elephant’s Child” here. The entire end of the snout was swollen and there was red blood in a nostril. I’ve seen injured coyotes bask in the sun — I think this must be an instinctual reaction to help speed up, the healing — at least the warm sun might help soothe pain. And, in this case, this coyote spent time soothing its sore nose against the soft skin of its underside, as can be seen in the last photo.

This kind of laceration on the snout may have been caused by a fight. Might it have been with a raccoon as a predator, or maybe with another coyote over territory? Or maybe this coyote had been defending something precious, like a den? After all, it is pupping season.

Dynamics of Family Outings: Observations

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

On a walk recently, we saw three coyotes traversing together: it was a family, possibly returning home from a twilight hunt for gophers. There was a dog with us which was totally disciplined: it kept to the owner’s side as was demanded.

First we saw one coyote, on the path about 100 feet in front of us. It looked at us, curiously, but shyly stayed back. Then it approached a few paces and hid behind a tree — all except its face! I’m wondering if we were not supposed to see it! We all, including the dog, were looking at this young coyote. We found out that it was not alone when the mother appeared, interjecting herself right into our view. I’m sure the mother wanted to break the focus of attention on the younger coyote, because she appeared in her defensive stance: bent over with teeth showing — “Hey, please note that I’m here.” Her attention was on the dog.

Now, of course, our attention was on her, which is what she wanted. Since we have seen this family a number of times, we have come to know who they are and they have come to know who we are, as they have come to know everyone in their park, even when the “observed” were not aware of the observer. The mother calmed down when she saw that the dog was not interested in pursuing them — the dog was not a threat.

We watched as the first shy little guy dashed off to a high rock to watch us from a safer distance. A sibling then appeared out of nowhere up even higher on a cliff. Mom kept her eye on both, looking up at one, and then down at the other.  The sibling then came running down from the cliff to be with mom, and they both then kept their eyes on the shy guy. Ultimately, the shy guy hurried off, and the others followed.

———-

A few days afterwards, we saw the same family dynamics: the family was out on a path, purposefully going somewhere. The mom and sibling kept track of the shy guy, they waited for each other to catch up, and they seemed to communicate through their glances, through eye contact.

In this second case, mom soon ran up to a high ledge where she watched the youngsters head to a lower area. Here, the two youngsters kept track of mom by continually watching her, but they also watched and listened as walkers arrived below on a path. The arrival of the walkers was the sign that they should depart, which they did.

The mother, as is her habit, waited to depart. But instead of remaining on her high ledge, she actually hopped down to a lower rock where she watched a “regular” group of unleashed dogs and walkers as they approached in her direction. I wondered why she had hopped down — I was afraid she might have “something to say” to these dogs, such as “remember that I am here”, by appearing in their path. But no, when they got within about 100 feet, coming into view from around some trees, she scurried down from the rock  and hurried off into the distance.

So, here are a couple of instances when the members of this coyote family stayed together as they traversed a park: they kept track of each other, they followed each other, they waited for each other, and and they communicated with glances. I noticed several greetings between them:  they seemed to smile at each other or touch noses. These are the dynamics of a family group.

Different Seasons Bring Variations in Energy Levels & Behavior

I have noticed that the coyotes are a little more “purposefully” active lately — this is after several months of being much less so. Whenever I spotted a coyote during the previous few months, it was not so “out in the open” and its behavior was not so “purposeful”, but rather “lazy” and “ho-hum.”

Within the last two weeks this seems to have changed somewhat: I’m seeing more intention in their behaviors when I see them and slightly more activity.  Could this be a seasonal phenomenon?  Could it be that hormones have changed, whether or not there are new pups involved? For instance, roaming seems to be done more as an adult family unit — a pack — with the attendant “watching out” for one another. Also, although the “dog watching” continues to be infrequent and sporadic as it has been in the last few months, when I do see this, it appears to be more intent: there is less intermittent dozing when they do watch or monitor the dogs in the park, and they sometimes hurry to better viewing spots, even though these new spots bring the coyotes closer in to the dogs — maybe 200 feet away.

Again, here it is important to keep our dogs leashed, both for our dogs’ protection and for the coyotes. We all want to avoid encounters which might lead to possible injuries. The animals are just doing what their instincts demand of them in warding off each other.  Only we humans can prevent the closer interactions by keeping the animals apart. Please read the “Coyote Safety” posting at the top of the page.

No Puppies?

It is pupping season, females are having their pups. It has been noticed that the amount of resources and territory size seem to affect litter size. In an urban park with limited resources, the litters that I am aware of from previous years were small in size: one or two pups is what I have seen.

But why would a female coyote not have pups at all this year? My husband suggested that she might not have found the right guy! This is a likely possibility since we have not seen a male around in her area. However, males have made their rounds in the past, why not now? Another possibility for no pups is that any puppies didn’t survive for long. Apparently there is only a 5-20% survival rate for coyote puppies. Although there will be no way to tell for sure, there are various indications that there might have been puppies that did not survive the week after birth to a female who has had pups for the last two seasons. I’m putting this in here only as a possibility — the thought occurred to me.

Around mid-April there was definitely a change in behavior patterns for this coyote. This coyote had remained exceedingly calm during the previous few months, only to become “edgy” and “touchy” for a few weeks in mid-April, especially in her reacting more immediately to dog interferences from a longer distance away, but also in her need to “move on” and not loiter. A “purposefulness” seems to have returned to her which she has not had for the last few months. Then I became aware of a time stretch when this coyote did not come out into the open. Of course, maybe I just missed her, but because of other indicators, I am thinking of another possibility.

During this period of absence, on the night of April 21st, at 11:00 pm, there was a family howling session. The family howling could very well have been a “farewell” to pups who did not survive. We have not heard the “group” howling in a while. Please see my posting on “A Coyote Story”. Few people realize the extent of mourning that goes on in the animal kingdom, that animals have intense feelings. The one first-hand observation which I have of an animal mourning is that of a Mourning Dove. This dove decided to nest in a window box of ours, so I was able to see the progression. I saw when the first egg was put down on April 28th and then I saw the mother sit on it all the time. Then I noticed fluff underneath her, and then, wow, I saw that there were actually TWO chicks in there! Then, on May 20th, tragedy struck. No longer was she in the nest. We rushed down to the porch below to find remnant feathers. We didn’t connect the dots until this happened: for the previous two days there had been two ravens hanging around the area. We all mourned this loss. However, it was the mother’s behavior that was so heart wrenching. The next morning she returned to the roof edge of the house next door, looking into her nest, and morned loudly all morning. She just stayed in that one location cooing her sorrow. We awoke the next morning to find ONE new egg in the nest — she abandoned it. Was there a message in leaving this lone egg?

Then, AFTER this coyote group howling session, yet still during the period when I noticed this coyote’s “absence” I spotted a young member of her “family” carrying food off to the den area: might this have been to feed a mother — an instinctual need to help out which kicked in because this young coyote had not totally understood death? This was on April 23rd. Family members often bring food to a new mom so that she can remain in a den to feed her new pups and keep them warm. Of course, she has to emerge for water, but helping with the food allows her to stay for longer periods of time with any newborn puppies.

This female can now be seen at times ranging with her full-grown pups from last year — it now is an adult pack of coyotes, with the dominant mom who is looked up to. There is no sign of denning or pups in this particular group. Her previous regular patterns of behavior have changed: she seems more vigilant, more purposeful and more on the move.

Habitats, Ecology: Thoughts

The documentary movie “Ocean” offers an overwhelming portrayal of what our planet has to offer in the way of wildlife, a wildlife with intricate adaptations to an astonishing environment — it portrays an incredible balance which has worked its way into existence over the millennia. The fleeting glimpse and hearsay that most of us get in regards to the wildness that is left on our planet do not come close to conveying what is out there. Seeing “Ocean”, which brings you in close, may do that for you. Shouldn’t we allow this incredible existence to survive, shouldn’t we stop intruding on it? Humans are very self-centered creatures, as are all creatures — the difference is that we humans have the ability not to be. Humans have stripped the earth of much of its resources for our own benefit. We pollute without thinking of the others with whom we share the planet. And ultimately humans want to manage everything according to their own view — have we really forgotten that nature balances itself best? It is best to leave everything we can alone.

Cleaning up the environment is one thing we need to do — we caused this problem. But do we need to actually recreate environments by introducing species that have not been there for centuries, or by removing what is now there? In the San Francisco area, we have a native plant program: a program for reintroducing native plants, and removing everything this program calls “invasive” or “non-native”. However, the native plant program has not been thought out thoroughly — there are repercussions involving the removal of plants and underbrush that serve as protective animal habitats. The program is a”fad” advocated by the very few and basically put up with by the many who don’t know how nor have the time to fight it. The programs hopes to alter an entire third of our park space. This program is an arbitrary one, with no scientific basis. Their need seems to be to “manage” everything — to intrude and control and change things “in their own image.” No one is against native plants, but to tear down everything that came after an arbitrary date is not scientific and not wanted by most people.

A posting I received from the Ethological Ethics Yahoo group, written by Marc Bekoff and David Crawford, states my position nicely: “A number of ethical questions arise that warrant serious consideration because we, human beings with large brains, self-centered importance, and a tendency to be thoroughly and uniquely invasive, can do anything we want to other animals and their habitats. Many conservationists are concerned about the widespread loss of critical habitat as we redecorate nature. Loss of habitat is . . . an environmental matter.” The San Francisco Natural Areas Program is willingly sacrificing the habitat of owls, raccoons, and coyotes for that of butterflies and damselflies — is this not ethically wrong? They need to realize that they are intruding upon ecosystems which have been evolving since 1776 — the date they have chosen to return to. You can’t go back.

“Can we really “recreate” or “restore” ecosystems?” ”. . . It is difficult if not impossible to recreate or restore ecosystems to what they were in the past,”  say Bekoff and Crawford.

One of my favorite websites is one where the blogger really appreciates the nature that he encounters: Coyote Watches. There are exquisite photos of trees and birds, and writings about nature that everyone will thoroughly appreciate.

Next Newer Entries