Reproductive Dominance/Jealousy

To insure her reproductive supremacy and exclusiveness, mothers get hard on their daughters. These videos show various versions of the same thing. It can begin as early as seven months and as late as two years, and sometimes the whole process is bypassed. It may involve steely staring, body slamming, and or constant put downs — all to impose dominance and control over the younger coyote.

In the most recent video, this one at the top, the behavior actually has been going on for months, but each time there seems to be a crescendo, with Mom keeping daughter on her back for longer and longer periods of time. These put-downs occur multiple times each day. I’ve been expecting not to see the daughter after these repeated episodes, but, so far, daughter has always appeared the next day.

One reason for this might be is that she is best buddies with her brother: they exude overwhelming joy when they see each other: possibly the attraction is stronger than the repulsion behavior from Mom. Today, in fact, neither daughter or the son was around, but this has happened before, for a couple of days, and then, surprise, they can be seen trekking through their area.

If the treatment by Mom doesn’t cause daughters to actually leave, it probably serves to increase cortisol from stress, which inhibits the production of female hormones. I don’t know the biology beyond this. In this case, the youngster then would stay and help raise next years’ pups.

Another thing I’ve seen is two-year-old daughters who have not dispersed develop swollen teats. It doesn’t appear that they produce any pups, but I can’t be certain about this. In this case, they could serve as wet-nurses, helping the mother to feed the pups. I can’t think of why else their teats would be swollen and extended.

Daughter in this first video is one and a half years old. I caught the daughter approaching in still shots, so the video begins with stills until I switch over to video mode. These put-downs have been lasting longer and longer — the video of the entire put-down lasted 8 full minutes.

Daughter in this second video, below, is only 7 months old. I wondered if she were showing dominant characteristics which might have caused her mother to beat her in this fashion. Interestingly, only a week after this video was taken, Mom disappeared and never returned. Although she might have been hit by a car or had some other fatal mishap, it occurred to me that she herself decided to leave rather than deal with a daughter she knew might take over. And in fact, her daughter became the alpha on her territory for the rest of her long life: 1.5 years.

And here are move videos of the same thing:

In this next video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M06O6tTP0kc], first you see younger brother taunting his older sibling. She’s not allowed to taunt back so she just defends herself. And that’s when Mom comes by and body slams her until she runs off with her tail between her legs.

This next video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mlk8b3E4DM] begins with body slams and then proceeds to steely staring by Mom. In this case, interestingly, when all was said and done, it’s Mom and Dad who left the territory because they could not make daughter leave. I’m wondering if something might have been wrong with her. Two suitors came by, but they ended up driving her out and forming a family with another female.

This video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G759qwLVI8I] is of the same coyotes as the video immediately above: Mom, two year old daughter and one year old son. I think son is simply copying Mom, and since he has her support and isn’t disciplined, he continues doing what Mom is doing: viciously attacking. Mom, of course, is attacking to drive her daughter out. In most cases, the daughter would definitely feel unwelcomed and eventually leave. Notice also the silent steely staring which is a hugely strong communication.

The purpose in all cases is to get daughter to disperse — to leave. There is room only for one alpha reproducing pair on any one territory. Here in San Francisco, those territories run about 2 to 2.4 square miles. In only one instance have I ever seen two families — two unrelated families — live on one territory, and this lasted only from birth of the pups until mid-summer. None of their pups survived which makes me believe that the parents were ill in addition to the mange they had.

I want to point out that family infighting is indeed intense, as seen in these videos, but it’s mostly psychological, along with some body slams and pinch/nips. As far as I’ve seen, the rank and dispersal issues leading to family infighting are qualitatively different from a battle with an outsider coyote (not with a family member), as, say, in a territorial battle. Below are some intense wounds from vicious territorial battles with outsider coyotes — all drew blood — and even a death (the last photo, under the flowers is a coyote whose jugular vein was severed by another coyote).

Addendum: An important piece of information that few people ever consider is the amount of stress and anxiety involved in dispersal. There’s often anger and hostility from the parents who are excluding these youngsters, but also the sheer fear of the youngster who don’t necessarily understand this about-face from their parents, youngsters who don’t know where to go, don’t know where they belong, are in uncharted dangerous territory and actually running scared from the unknown and from hostile coyotes and dogs. Yesterday, December 31, 2024, I came across two yearling siblings — one and a half years old — who had been expelled from their territory. They didn’t really want to leave, but you can see from the above videos that that is what they had to do. When I saw them, they were anxious and exhausted from the trauma. One ate grass and threw it up. The other plopped herself on the ground and went to sleep. We humans don’t often realize how sensitive and feeling coyotes are. They’ve been displaced, and have the same type of feelings we might have in the same situation. Here are the photos I took of them, a mile away from their territorial border:

© All information and photos in my postings come from my own original and first-hand documentation work which I am happy to share, with permission and with properly displayed credit©janetkessler/coyoteyipps.com.

Come Learn WHO Our Coyotes Are: Upcoming 2025 Winter Presentations by Janet

January 11, Saturday 3 to 4:30 pm
Golden Gate Valley Branch Library
1801 Green Street, San Francisco
415 355-5666

January 22, Wednesday, 6:30 to 7:45
Glen Park Branch Library
2825 Diamond Street, San Francisco
415 355-2858

February 15, Saturday, 3 to 4:30,
Bernal Heights Branch Library
500 Cortland Ave., San Francisco
415 355-2810

March 1, Saturday, 3 to 4:30
Presidio Branch Library
3150 Sacramento Street, San Francisco
415 355-2880

March 12, Wednesday at Noon,
Presidio, [Private Group]

April 1, Tuesday, 6 to 7:30 pm
North Beach Branch Library
350 Columbus Avenue, SF
415 355-5626

Pupping season is fast approaching in April: it might be a good idea to learn something more about our coyotes than the very preventable dog/coyote incidents you hear about in the news.

I’ll be explaining coyote population structure and distribution, family life and interactions, and how to understand and diminish dog encounters — all based on my own observations here in San Francisco. I’ll also talk briefly about the coyotes in the immediate neighborhood.

First come, first serve, so be sure to come early to claim your space!

From my previous talk at the Park branch library: “The Coyote Lady”, Janet Kessler is a self-taught naturalist who has spent nearly two decades conducting daily field research documenting urban coyote behavior and family life. In this presentation, Kessler will share her first-hand information, compassion and love for the animals, as she tells you what you need to know about them.

Kessler will discuss where they are, who they are and how to get along. She will also describe what to expect if you have a dog and you encounter a coyote.

Documenting her experiences with a camera, Kessler has come to know and identify most of the coyotes and their families here in San Francisco. She has been able to map the general extent of each of their territories and some of their dispersals here in the City. Kessler has collaborated with Dr. Benjamin Sacks’ genetic lab at UC Davis where the DNA from scat she collected is being analyzed.

Misrepresenting *Incidents*

Video posted on NextDoor (see below) taken by a bystander who claims the coyotes in this video followed and then cornered a dog and walker . The video repeats several times, giving you an opportunity to see what happens.

Reports of dog/coyote incidents this year seemed to be up, including three small dogs killed at Crissy Field by a coyote. But are there more such incidents? Whether there are or not, all could have been prevented had there been fuller education and effective signage.

Take Crissy Field. Coyotes have appeared on Crissy Field regularly for many years. Lack of adequate signage, along with only a few reported coyote sightings during doggie play time, probably contributed to folks feeling that, since it was a designated *off leash* area, it was safe for their little dogs. But an *off leash* area means nothing more than that dog-owners are not going to be ticketed here for having their dogs off-leash. It does not imply that the area is free of coyotes nor necessarily safe for little dogs. Even in off-leash areas, an owner must always stay vigilant and constantly supervise their pets for many reasons: including danger from larger dogs an yes, coyotes — and children notoriously get nipped by dogs. Coyotes and dogs don’t like each other and don’t get along. Coyotes live throughout the entirety of San Francisco, so small dogs especially should never be left unsupervised wherever they are.

Because of the loss of 3 small dogs to coyotes in Crissy Field, coyotes became a political issue with pressure put on the City to do something about the coyotes. The city bowed to the pressure and went out and shot the coyote culprit, and signs have finally been posted in the area.

For months afterwards, some of the dog owners wanted more done than this. They banned together, vowing to keep the Crissy Field issue alive. They wanted *something done* about the coyotes: they wanted them culled, relocated, neutered — anything to diminish or get rid of them. They claimed that, because of more reported sightings and more reported incidents, that we were being overrun by coyotes. But I haven’t found evidence of this in the territories I keep track of.

When I’ve asked specifically WHERE in the city someone has seen *more* coyotes, they list several different places in the city where they have seen one or several, and then rely on the sightings by other people to support their belief that we are being overrun by coyotes who, to them, have become a problem. I know most of the coyote families and their territories, and I can vouchsafe that there are not more in the seventeen territories I know well: just one family per territory. Yes, sometimes the coyotes become more visible, and there have been regular *hotspots* which they frequent for stretches of time during the long denning season, but this doesn’t equate to an increase in their population. The population for each family/territory is a routinely fluctuating one, expanding during the pupping season and then shrinking back down to the alpha parents with often several yearlings lingering to help with the following year’s pups before moving on. Territories are owned by an alpha breeding pair and their pups and yearlings (yearlings are pups born the previous year) who generally disperse sometime before two years of age. Those who survive cars appear to move south and out of the city because all territories are already taken within the city proper.

As part of the effort to keep the *dangerous coyote* story alive, the incidents of the three dogs killed at Crissy Field were reported in at least four different newspapers. On NextDoor, there have been many postings of simple sightings informing folks to “please watch your pets” — these are valuable notices to people with pets. But these postings inevitably attract doomsday comments and opinions, many of them fear-mongering from people who don’t want coyotes here.

In addition, some mere sightings have been spun into postings of tall tales — on the same level as the runner in Marin who claimed to have been attacked by a coyote which turned out to be fabricated [https://coyoteyipps.com/2022/08/21/attacker-or-attacked/]. Some of the postings about coyotes chasing dogs and their walkers, or coyotes killing dogs, are simply not true, and I now wonder how many of these stories have been *enhanced* or totally made up. Since these are reports I’m seeing on NextDoor, I can image that the same reports are sent to Animal Care and Control (ACC). ACC does not vet what they hear — I know this from personal first-hand experience. So their statistics are not reliable: garbage in = garbage out. [Vetted: critically reviewed and evaluated for official approval or acceptance]

Here is one such posting on NextDoor which attracted a slew of fearful comments and misinformed speculations. Fortunately, as many commentators saw through to the reality. I hope folks are aware of these for what they are.

1. Here is a link to one of the *incidents*, the one associated with the above posted video: [https://nextdoor.com/p/bpt5DR4Pd2Rr?utm_source=share&slp=&share_platform=1&extras=NTM1NzAw]

Martha: Edited • Saw this at 7:40am this morning. They were chasing and trying to corner a man and his 50 lb dog (seen towards end of video in yellow shirt). I walk my 12 lb yorkie after 9am for this reason and avoid walks after sun down. This is not the first time they’ve approached humans here. There’s a daycare 100 ft away, too. Near 18th St and Carolina St., between two apartment buildings. Edit: I was at the gym and noticed the man run across the paseo with his dog first. He looked concerned and was looking over his shoulder. At that point I suspected a coyote would show up and I took out my phone since my neighbors also reported seeing coyotes here. I didn’t expect to see two hunting together. I stopped my workout to go scare the coyotes but by the time I got outside they all were gone. Edit 2: The man did not stumble upon the coyotes. They followed him. I have a newer post that shows from my building’s security footage that they were on his tail.

Take a careful look at the video to see what is actually going on. Here is a fearful commentator and then my reply to her:
Gloria: This is very scary. Coyotes are out of control in San Francisco. These coyotes obviously wanted that man’s dog. My reply: Gloria, “Obviously”? I think you need to look at the video again: the coyotes in fact are obviously AVOIDING the dog. When they see what way the man is going, they go the other way.

2 .Here’s the link to another: [https://nextdoor.com/p/JyWwxSYCFFK8?utm_source=share&slp=&share_platform=1&extras=NTM1NzAw]

Gayle: 10/24 at 1:00am on De Haro & 17th Street someone’s dog was killed by two coyote’s who chased it into a corner and mutilated the poor pup. The sounds were spine chilling. I ran outside with a broom to help but the dog was already dead and being carried away. How is this acceptable? This is a city, not a National Park. I am an animal person all the way, but living with wild animals is NOT OK. We must call the police and complain. There are now 4 dens on Potrero Hill. I see them weekly now.

This is a third person reporting on a supposition or presumption, without checking out the details — and it was posted at least three times. There was a *sound*. No one saw an incident. I myself have heard raccoons emit spine chilling sounds when they are attacked by a coyote. No dog owner has come forth saying their dog was mauled or missing — i.e., this would have been a first person account. Few dogs in fact are out at 1:00 am in the morning, especially running loose, whereas this is prime time for raccoons to be out. So I’m doubting the report and calling it “garbage in” barring further evidence. But it has generated a large number of comments and amplified existing fears.

Botanical Garden Incident of June 30, 2024: In addition to the Crissy Field coyote/dog incients, we’ve had several instances of bad news over the summer concerning the coyotes. In the Botanical Garden at the end of June a coyote bit a small child at a daycamp. The repercussion from the City was to shoot three coyotes from one coyote family indiscriminately. I knew about the den there: I had seen Mom coyote lactating and the rest of the family come out at dusk for their activities. But the City denied there was a den there, and said the bite had been caused by a rare “aggressive coyote”. In fact many people, including the City, knew there was a den there, so my question to them was: Why were not denning signs posted? Why weren’t the camp counselors educated adequately? Precautions could have been taken to prevent such an incident, but were not. Then in the aftermath, we learned that THREE coyotes were shot. Why three, I had to ask. In fact, one of those shot was a three-month old pup: what other proof does the city want that a den was there?, but the City never corrected their misinformation, even though they knew the facts.

Lastly, and impressively, The Chronicle on October 30, 2024 in their article by Nora Mishanec entitled “Reports of S.F. coyote encounters exploded this year. What should the city do about it?” The article was sensationalist and fear provoking more than anything else.

The word *exploded* stands out, and implies a huge increase in both sightings and actual incidents., if not even an *explosion* in their population. The word *explosion* is most often associated with population numbers. Further reading shows there were 600 reports of encounters. C’mon everyone! This is less than two sightings/encounters a day in a population of 90 adult coyotes and a human population of 788K in 2024 and a dog population of over 200K. One has to question the newsworthiness of what the Chronicle writes, except to fan the flames of controversy and raise the level of fear. Here is the article for anyone interested: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/coyote-encounters-animal-control-19855206.php. There is also a map of the 690 sightings: https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2024/coyote-sightings-sf/. I want readers to beware that these sightings have very little to do with the coyotes and their population, and much more to do with the few humans who decide they need to report them: most people don’t report sightings, but people who are afraid have been encouraging everyone, on NextDoor, to report these. Where groups of individuals are pressing folks to report these, of course, there are more reports.

What I’m trying to point out is that coyote sightings, coyotes looking at you, coyotes walking in your same direction across the street or even 30 feet away, should not be *alarming incidents*, and neither should coyotes following or escorting dogs. These things happen regularly and should be expected in an urban environment. Dog owners can keep situations from escalating by keeping their dogs from barking at or lunging at coyotes: these things incite coyotes to react negatively: walking on and away from the coyotes — without running — almost always de-escalates tensions between dogs and coyotes.